Which Angel do you prefer?

Walking around Sailortown today, I noticed the Flying Angel statue outside the Mission to Seafarers was just about to fall into complete shadow given the tall houses recently recently built directly opposite it on Pilot Street. This isn’t something I pay a lot of attention to, mainly because I pass it too regularly. The last of some glorious late afternoon sun was just catching parts of the statue. From one particular angle, the angel’s right hand seemed to be aflame, a nice visual metaphor of an angel burning with the power to assist.

I took out my phone camera (HTC One X) which isn’t bad but isn’t all that good and grabbed a few shots, one close in, one further back, one from a completely different angle which lost the glowing hand effect but got some of the immediate skyline including the (sadly disused) Franciscan Church of St. Joseph’s just down the street. I wonder which capture people prefer?

Up close and personal? Is the context too limited? Does the daytime moon just become distracting wthout being big enough to be interesting?

Up close and personal? Is the context too limited? Does the Mission’s cross just look like a stray piece of scaffolding or an aerial mast? Does the daytime moon just become distracting wthout being big enough to be interesting? I love the way the flaming hand stretches right out at you, though.

Context provided here, but unfortunately it isn't avery pretty building and the ship's mast/cross just looks like a stray bit of iron works without a bit more context, perhaps?

Context provided here, but unfortunately it isn’t a very pretty building and the dark shadow is a bit annoying. At least the cross in the shape of a ship’s mast looks like one, especially if the angel is a clue that we’re photographing something in a Christian context.

Ecumenically reaching out its hand to grasp the spire of the (sadly disused) Franciscan Church of St. Joseph's. Unlike the first two photos, the sun isn't striking the angel's hand at the perfect angle to make it a fiery paw.

Ecumenically reaching out its hand to grasp the spire of St. Joseph’s. Unlike the first two photos, the sun isn’t striking the angel’s hand at the perfect angle to make it a fiery paw. The photo is a bit dark but that can be fixed easily enough even with the software in the phone, let alone Photoshop.

The first shot is taken with quite a bit of ‘digital zoom’. So-called ‘digital zoom’ is a cod by camera companies’ marketing men to trap the unwary; the sensor isn’t any larger in capture capacity and without a zoom lens there is no zoom. All this does is capture a small part of the image and make it fill your camera’s preview screen, often with attendant noise and distortion. Digital zoom can be useful in framing a shot as long as you bear in mind that doesn’t mean that you’ll get any bigger a useable image than you would just by cropping the shot afterwards… but I digress

The flying angel has been the symbol of the Mission to Seafarers since 1856, inspired by Revelation 14:6 – “And I saw another angel fly in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting gospel to preach unto them that dwell on the earth, and to every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people.” The Mission to Seafarers is an Anglican ministry to people who work on the high seas – it doesn’t do prosyletisation, although it prays with and for people who wish its chaplains to do so. Its mainstay is providing justice and welfare services, communication with home and counselling support to people who work away from home for many months at a time, often under very poor conditions of employment, to deliver the goods which most of us consider necessary for our standard of living. Please consider learning more about the work of this wonderful organisation on its website.

This entry was posted in Christianity, Photography. Bookmark the permalink.